Dohma Reality Check

What real paint would get this room closest to the concept?

An AI image can hold a useful design intention without being a reliable paint specification. This page separates the catalog facts, the image’s measured appearance, and the choice only the person living with the room can make.

The caption’s conflicting name and code are evidence to resolve, not the final verdict. The goal is an honest path from a picture you like to a paint you can sample on the real wall.

design source

Start with the bundled proof, or bring your own design.

Source material

One room, two images

Outlined area: Main wall, right of the window

The room as photographed before the AI concept was made. — The room as photographed

The AI concept of the same room, with a soft greige wall. — The AI concept of the same room. “Walls painted Benjamin Moore Pale Oak OC-52.”— captioned by the model

Uses the same action layer as analyze_active_design.

Working document

Reality Plan

claim-001

This plan is waiting for evidence. An agent can run analyze_active_design, or you can press Analyse this design on the page.

What the AI claimed

Verified fact

Benjamin Moore Pale Oak OC-52

Recorded from the fixed caption attached to the bundled concept image.

What the catalog verifies

Verified fact

No catalog result yet. Running the design analysis performs the deterministic lookup.

What the image appears to show

Inferred appearance

No pixel measurement or model read yet. Running the analysis produces both and labels them separately.

What paint alone can and cannot reproduce

Verified fact

The analysis will separate reproducible paint properties from lighting, camera and image effects.

Named-colour path

Verified fact

This path appears after the design analysis runs.

Appearance-match path

Inferred appearance

This path appears after the design analysis runs.

The other colour the measurement allows

Inferred appearance

If the ranking turns out not to be decisive, a second appearance colour appears here.

Which product, and on what basis

Rule recommendation

The product recommendation appears once the analysis has run.

What the person confirmed

Human decision

No confirmation yet. Only the person can answer the decision question below.

Real-world specification

Human decision

The complete specification appears once the person confirms a plan.

What remains simulated

Simulated preview

No preview has been rendered. After a human selection, a render can simulate that chosen plan.

Physical sample requirement

Physical confirmation required

A physical sample will be required whichever path wins. Confirm a plan first to identify which paint to sample.

Decision gate

What do you want to preserve?

Human decision

The agent cannot make this choice. It can verify the evidence and carry out the plan you confirm, but only you can decide which intention matters. Confirming adopts the whole specification below — colour, product, sheen and surface — not just the colour.

The paths appear here after this design has been analysed.

Reality-checked render

Choose a plan to preview it.

Simulated preview

Screen previews vary with lighting, substrate, sheen, application, camera, and display. Confirm with a physical sample.

Uses the same action layer as render_human_selected_plan.

Collaboration history

Nothing yet. Actions taken by you or by an agent appear here as they happen.

WebMCP not available in this browser. The page works normally; the agent tools are not discoverable. Open it in the ChatGPT desktop app’s built-in browser, or in Chrome 149+ with chrome://flags/#enable-webmcp-testing enabled.